CASE: Paul Cronan and New England Telephone Company (A) Essay -- Legal

CASE Paul Cronan and cutting England Telephone Company (A)I.LEGAL CASE ANALYSISA.FactsPaul Cronan was engage by New England Telephone (NET) in 1973 as a single file clerk. In 1983 he was promoted to service technician. He worked in Needham, Massachusetts for 18 months before counterchangering to South capital of Massachusetts, Massachusetts. In 1985, Cronan suffered from medical exam symptoms due to AIDS-related complex (ARC), and at sea work sporadically for 6 months. In June, 1985 Cronan requested a ordinal leave of absence from work for a doctors appointment. Cronans supervisor, Charles OBrian, demanded to know the nature of the illness, and assured him that the information would be unploughed confidential. Cronan conscious OBrian that the illness was AIDS-related, whereupon he wind the work apologize to see his doctor. OBrien informed his supervisor, Paul Cloran, of Cronans AIDS status, who in turn informed his own supervisor. The following day, in accordance with soci al club policy, OBrien mandated that Cronan see the company physician. After a 10 refined physical examination Cronan was sent home.Two days later, a coworker informed Cronan that news of his AIDS-related illness had spread around his co-workers, and that threats of physical violence were do against Cronan should he return. Fearing for his natural rubberty and health, Cronan requested medical leave, which was granted. He began receiving company-paid medical benefits, root departmental sickness benefits, then illness benefits. Illness benefits were extended some(prenominal) times to 12 months total.In August 1985, Cronan wished to return to work. His new supervisor, Richard Griffin, say that in accordance with company policy a medical security measures from his physician certifying his ability to return to work was required. Cronan obtained the certificate but as well as requested a transfer to another location. He did not receive a response to his request and did not return to the South Boston facility, fearing that he would be physically harmed.In September 1985, Cronan was hospitalized with AIDS. During this hospitalization he received a letter of condolence from Griffin offering a return to his previous go down with no mention of a transfer or new assignment. In December 1985, Cronan filed a lawsuit assisted by the Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts for $1.45 million in soil court, alleging invasion of privacy and ... ...cable illness that puts the workers at risk or requires medical evaluation. Even if the dissemination of this private information were inadvertent, processes should be in fanny to prevent such occurrences. The potential for the development of bigotry or a hostile work environment requires an ethical response. The foreknowledge of Cronans judge return to work at NET in any content mandates that he be allowed to work in a harmonious and safe environment. As ignorance was the main impetus for the majority of the behaviors not ed by Cronan, statement would be the solution. The ethical course of action would be initially providing far-flung company dissemination of the policy regarding AIDS in the workplace, followed by acute education of the workers about AIDS. An overall policy of intolerance of any bedevilment should be published and enforced.Finally, the ethical response to Cronan individually in the event as listed in the narrative would be to picture him a position constrained only by the limits of his medical condition where he would find job satisfaction in a workplace environment lax of hostility and sexual harassment, with relocation provided if necessary.